Advertisement
Here is a question I have always had fun pondering about when I go camping with friends.
If one were to be attacked by an huge grizzly bear, what would be the most effective weapon/round chambering be for stopping an attack if you are by yourself with a firearm.
Would .45, solid slug 12 guage , or 30-30 winchester work? if not what would?
I would like to know what your oppinion is.
If one were to be attacked by an huge grizzly bear, what would be the most effective weapon/round chambering be for stopping an attack if you are by yourself with a firearm.
Would .45, solid slug 12 guage , or 30-30 winchester work? if not what would?
I would like to know what your oppinion is.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Sun, August 31, 2008 - 9:49 PMjust saw that some of my question was answered in another thread. But does anyone care to add?
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Tue, September 9, 2008 - 4:46 PMI would go with solid copper sabots in the 12 ga. Their penetration and impact are on par with a double rifle. This is a grizzly we're talking about here, not an Arizona black bear. I'd carry either a 12ga or my 45-70 with 400 grain solids.
Another thing that people commonly assume about bears is that you can shoot them in the head. Don;t. Their skull is armor, you'll likely just waste your bullets. Go for a CNS or thoractic hit with a weapon of serious knockdown and penetration. -
-
Unsu...
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Thu, September 11, 2008 - 7:04 PMI've researched this question quite a bit. the conclusion I've come to is that a rocket-propelled grenade, or better, is the only surefire way to stop a grizzly bear. Anything short of that, ANYTHING short of that, is no guarantee at all.
The short answer is bring the biggest of what you have, and use it as many times as you can. 44mag or 10mm I would put as the minimum edge. Anything short of that is just wasting bullets. Well, not a complete waste. I mean, you do have somewhat of a false sense of security, a peace of mind that was nice to have until it vanished. And you also get to die feeling like you fought back. I suppose that's worth a few bucks. -
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Thu, September 11, 2008 - 8:11 PMTodd Jarrett was critisized by hunters for taking a shot at a running brown bear, through the trees, at fifty yards, with a 454 Cassul. Some people thought it was an was reckless and could have led to an inhumane wound for the bear.
Me, I figure he was one of the top shooters in the world, and he did hit the bear and drop it in one shot. So maybe for him it wasn't a reckless shot. For me, it'd be a waste of the ammo.
The 454 Cassul is about as close to carrying a 45-70 as you can get with a pistol. The Taurus Raging Bull comes with ports so it is actually a pretty soft shooter. Double action was a bit stiff, but it hit everything I pointed it at.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Sat, September 20, 2008 - 11:42 AMassume the fetal position. lol I knew a park ranger that trekked through alot of bear country that carried a 12 gauge loaded with bird shot to take out the bear's eye's then backed up with sluggs.
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Sun, September 21, 2008 - 8:10 AMYeah - I would want the heaviest hitting firearm I could carry. Short of that... something which would startle or scare off the bear might be more effective; I've heard of people getting decent results from irritants like mace / pepper spray... although I think I'd rather use a flame-thrower if I'm going with non-penetrating firepower. -
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Sun, September 21, 2008 - 1:48 PMI make the kids carry whistles when we camp. The whistle works when they get lost, and animals just don;t like it. Blow a whistle and put a tree between you. -
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Mon, September 22, 2008 - 4:47 PMI have heard that these bear banger shells are good to scare off a bear that is getting close.
They might also just piss off the bear and make things worse.
www.macecanada.com/canada/w...dges1.htm -
-
Unsu...
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Tue, September 23, 2008 - 5:20 PMHaha carwash.... that's totally what you need.... an encounter with a bear will usually happen at point-blank to 30 yards.... and you've got a gun full of bear-bangers that blow up after 40 yards of travel...
do you WANT the bear to stampede towards you?
-
-
-
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Tue, September 23, 2008 - 8:28 AMA 12 Guage magnum hand load with a magnum lead load of any shot (smaller is better) in a ringed round.
The smaller shot allows you to get more weight in the shell.
The magnum will freight the whole thing outta da barrel like who-don-it
The ringing of the shell allows the plastic body to stay nicely around the shot as the whole package comes charging out of the barrel.
When it hits it has take down power that will stop a moose in it's tracks and knock it down.
Interestingly the ringed round also has a better ballistic than most 12 gauge loads dropping maybe 6" over 50 yards
This is one round that will never come out the other side.
While the copper hollow points will prolly do the job, a magnum hand-load ringed is probably the most stopping power you can get.
However, It's my understanding that hypothetical bears are pretty harmless. -
-
Re: an hypothetical question about bears attacking you.
Wed, October 22, 2008 - 8:25 PMStay with a solid. Buckshot is fine for people, and chasing tigers out from ground cover, but not so hot for a 300+ bear. If you gotta pull a gun and shoot it, don;t half ass it. If you are in a situation that requires you to discarge a weapon then don;t fire any warning shots.
-