<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DC gun ban case - Gunversation; a tribe to discuss guns - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DC gun ban case</title>
      <link>http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#138de18c-ceeb-4c50-8b2c-7d5c2aa4faff</link>
      <description>Charleton Heston is probably glad he's not dealing with this crap anymore.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#138de18c-ceeb-4c50-8b2c-7d5c2aa4faff</guid>
      <dc:creator>$item.owner.firstName</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-14T19:28:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DC gun ban case</title>
      <link>http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#ae1fc471-718d-422c-8eae-f6e9f8cdc4cb</link>
      <description>YAh huh?   As I predicted  there are no real changes across the country at all.&#xD;
&#xD;
States and municipalities  can still regulate  about as harshly as they please so long as they don't try a "total ban."  Which of course means they could try to limit caliber and size  and even  ban all but single shot breach loaders.   The result would be more litigation and more  high court holdings slowly drawing closer to a bright line.  But the supreme Court is  loath to articulate a bright line.&#xD;
&#xD;
And damn-it-all-to-hell they did not incorporate the second amendment unto the states.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#ae1fc471-718d-422c-8eae-f6e9f8cdc4cb</guid>
      <dc:creator>ALLAH God of all</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-14T16:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DC gun ban case</title>
      <link>http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#6d90777e-c1b8-4e16-a873-a193b085603c</link>
      <description>Ding Dong! The witch is dead!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#6d90777e-c1b8-4e16-a873-a193b085603c</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-11T21:41:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DC gun ban case</title>
      <link>http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#233be033-c484-4c22-925d-ab16d8c74ab1</link>
      <description>Will be decided soon maybe this or next  week&#xD;
&#xD;
Jeffry Toobin and the Christian Science Monitor think the Justices will do some thing important.&#xD;
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0319/p25s07-usju.html&#xD;
&#xD;
Maybe even incorporate the Second Amendment onto the states with some trestrictions  as Toobin said:  "holding that you can get a hand gun but not a surface to air missile." &#xD;
&#xD;
I have said before and I still think that   the Court is going to do very, very little.  That when they are done that there be no change outside of maybve altering the  applicability of the DC ban. &#xD;
In my experience the Supremes  tend not to  show their cards.   In fact many judges at appellate level and higher tend to  appear  as if they are leaning  in a direction in which they are not going to end up.  You can be arguing an appeal and the judge giving you the harshest rash of shit may be your strongest advocate on the panel. &#xD;
&#xD;
I think that when it's all over there won't be any changes in the  gun ownership lives of any one outside DC. &#xD;
&#xD;
But hoping for the Second amendment to be  incorporated as to the states is  -  well -  a nice thing to hope for. &#xD;
&#xD;
Here's to hope~!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunversation.tribe.net/thread/f1c1b1f1-0836-4748-adc7-400f92491324#233be033-c484-4c22-925d-ab16d8c74ab1</guid>
      <dc:creator>ALLAH God of all</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-24T15:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



